Posted on: November 14, 2008 1:27 pm
Edited on: November 14, 2008 9:46 pm

Final thoughts on the upcoming Big East season

Now that every team has been previewed, it's time for me to collect my thoughts. This league is probably one of the toughest in history to predict, but I'm going to take a shot at it. First I'll arrange the teams by tiers, then I'll project the finish, and finally I'll have some thoughts on how the conference teams will do in the preseason tournaments. I had about 80% of this finished when my browser crashed before, so this is more hurried and probably has dropped in quality; apologies for that.

I believe that the nine-team-in projection is not at all far-fetched, and that as many as 12 might see some postseason play or other. It will all depend on nonconference performance and the new conference tourney format. I'm excited for the first Big East games tonight, starting at 7 PM, and can't wait for the season in general. Now, on to business...

Tiers of Teams

Stratifying the league even this way is difficult. There are four preseason title contenders, and I agree that they're the most likely winners, but I doubt they finish 1-4. The next groups of teams are hard to separate, with a lot of teams bearing hugely talented rosters and similar weak spots. Regardless, I think I have come up with a reasonable, though admittedly subjective, set of crieteria for differentiating what we've got. (Each tier is listed alphabetically)

Tier One:

Connecticut, Louisville

These teams have the best combination of talent, balance, and depth to be the clear-cut favorites. They aren't the only two who could win the league, but I'd be surprised if either finished outside the top 4.

Tier Two:

Notre Dame, Pittsburgh

These teams have a ton of returning talent, but lack either the balance (Pitt) or the depth (ND) to be favored over the above teams. The next group of teams could easily displace either of these, but I'd be surprised if either finished lower than sixth.

Tier Three:

Marquette, Syracuse, Villanova, West Virginia

Between tiers three and four is in my opinion the toughest place to draw a line. The distinction I drew is that these four teams I believe have the biggest chance to sneak into the top four, and would surprise me the most to finish out of the top half of the league.

Tier Four:

Georgetown, Providence

I believe one of these two teams will be left out of the Big Dance, and neither looks to me to have the talent to sneak into the top 4. Either one could surpass some of the teams in tier three, though, if things break the right way.

Tier Five:

Cincinnati, Rutgers, Seton Hall

These are the teams between NCAA rosters and terrible. I don't believe any is capable of squeezing into the top half of the league, but the one who puts together the best resume will probably land in the NIT. I think any of these could be competitive in some other conferences out there.

Tier Six:

DePaul, South Florida, St. John's

This is the dead weight. A 13th place finish would be a major victory for any of these three teams. I hate to be that harsh, but there's just no comparison between these rosters and most others in the Big East.

Projected Final Standings:

I'm not kidding when I say how hard this is. So before you flame me, homers, for having your team too low, remember that I've probably considered every legitimate argument your team has and decided that the others' have slightly more weight. Finishing tenth in this conference is not an insult...that team will be a very good one whether it's my pick or not. So before you say there's "no way" it could be your team, really consider the competition. I believe anyone but my top five could actually end up in the ten spot. OK, no more hedging, here's my order.

  1. Louisville (NCAA) They're my pick thanks to an easier schedule than the Huskies
  2. Connecticut (NCAA) They have the most talent, but a very rough road.
  3. Pittsburgh (NCAA) I pick them here largely because they get my next two teams at the Peterson Events Center, where they don't lose many games.
  4. Syracuse (NCAA) Someone will oust one of the "top four" and my pick is the Orange. I choose them because I believe they have the best combination of returning scorers and new talent from my "tier three" teams.
  5. Notre Dame (NCAA) I choose them to be bumped from the top four because I believe they are the least set up for the long haul. Their talent makes them capable of beating any team, but its concentration in two or three players makes them vulnerable.
  6. Villanova (NCAA) Experience wins my vote among some hard to separate squads.
  7. West Virginia (NCAA) The Mountaineers return more talent than most realize, and have an excellent recruiting class. They will have the best defense of several BE teams relying on forwards and no center up front.
  8. Marquette (NCAA) I hate to pick a team with this much talent this low, but teams 1-7 are that good.
  9. Providence (NCAA) They have the schedule to make something of a run, and more talent than you think.
  10. Georgetown (NIT) There. I did it. The Hoyas are reloading and I think it costs them. If they prove me wrong (higher than 8th place) I'll eat my crow.
  11. Seton Hall (NIT) I throw them up here largely because of Cincinnati's injuries, but also recognizing that here are some good pieces in place here.
  12. Cincinnati (CBI) They were going to be my surprise NCAA pick until they lost three players. Watch out for this team in 2009-2010
  13. Rutgers (none) They have enough players I like to keep them out of the bottom three.
  14. St. John's (none) Down at this level, experience is king, and they have grown together as a team and are well-coached.
  15. DePaul (none) I give them a slight edge over the Bulls.
  16. South Florida (none) I could really see a 1-17 conference record here, with a home win over DePaul.
So there it is. Teams 8 and 9, whether they are my picks or not, had better 1) excel in the ooc and 2) not flame out in the BE tournament. If that happens it will get the top 12 a chance to play in a postseason tournament. Of course, teams 9-12 had better win those opening round games, too...

The Big East in preseason tournaments

Connecticut - Paradise Jam
They get an opening round matchup with La Salle that should be an easy win. Anything short of winning this tournament would be something of a failure, but Miami, San Diego, and Wisconsin are all very dangerous. I'd most like to see the SD - UCONN matchup in the final. I'll say UCONN wins it, but it won't be easy.

Georgetown - Old Spice Classic
There' a very winnable opening round game against Wichita State, followed by a matchup with Siena or Tennessee. That second round game could be tough for the Hoyas to win. I think they face Tennessee (though Siena could surprise some folks) and lose. That would put them in the 3rd/5th place game with either Gonzaga or Michigan State, both games I think they would lose. With its 5th place finish, I think we will learn that Georgetown isn't a top 25 team just yet.

Notre Dame - Maui Invitational
OK, I have said that I think Indiana could stun Notre Dame in this opening round game for a number of reasons. Understand that that only means I give them about a 10% chance. Notre Dame should win that game. If they avoid that crazy upset, I believe they will defeat Texas and face UNC in the title game. Anything could happen there with Hansbrough out, or even with him playing 80%. This is an opportunity for the Big East to really flex a muscle early.

Pittsburgh - Legends Classic
This almost doesn't deserve mention, but it is a preseason tournament...Pittsburgh first hosts Akron and Indiana (PA) (Fairleigh Dickinson, though in the tournament, doesn't count as part of the tournament in tonight's game @ Pitt). If Pitt loses either of those...OK, let's not think about that, but even if they do they meet Texas Tech in the semifinal and then either Mississippi State or Washinton State in the final. If Pittsburgh doesn't win the thing it will be a major failure.

Providence - Anaheim Classic
This is to me one of the more intriguing preseason tournaments, as it is loaded with teams trying to sneak into the national discussion but no clear powerhouses. There will be no easy games for the Friars, but I'm going to say they knock off Baylor, Arizona State, and Wake Forest consecutively to take home the title and secure one heck of an ooc resume. I realize I'm out on a limb, but Providence is better than the attention they're getting, and I look for them to prove it in a big way.

Seton Hall - Puerto Rico Season Tip Off
The Pirates will be without transfer Robert Mitchell for this tournament, and because of that I think they lose to USC with little contest. I do think they can win the loser's bracket and capture fourth place, though, with Chattanooga and Missouri as the likely opponents.

St. John's - NIT Season Tip Off
Cornell is a better team than St. John's, so I will say the Red storm likely go home early. However, if they pull that upset, the next round against Boston College or Loyola (MD) is easier. Again, I expect one-and-done, but if they win the first they might just win two. I see very little chance of further advance than that.

Syracuse - CBE Classic
This is the same format as the Legends Classic but less of a joke. Syracuse has all but assured wins in LeMoyne and Richmond to get things going, followed by a tough smeifinal against Florida. I say that Syracuse gets it done, beating Florida and then the defending champs. I think Florida will be the tougher of the two games, but this is the Orange's Chance to say "we're here."

Roundup: So, I see four preseason tournament champions (Connecticut, Pittsburgh, Providence, and Syracuse), one runner-up (Notre Dame) and two top half finishes (Georgetown, Seton Hall) for the Big East. The lone one-and-done I suspect will be St. John's. 

Note tournaments that I couldn't find brackets for include: West Virginia and DePaul in the Las Vegas Invitational, Cincinnati in the Global Sports Classic, Villanova in the Philly Classic, Marquette in the Chicago Invitational Challenge, and South Florida in the San Juan Shootout.  Of those, the most important game I'm aware of is a WV-Kentucky matchup, which I'll go ahead and pick the Mountaineers to win.

So, there you have it, my complete opinion on Big East basketball '08-'09. Thanks to everyone who took the time to bother reading all this the last few weeks; I hope you enjoyed reading it as much as I did putting it together. Let me know what you think, even if you think I'm an idiot, because I want to hear it! Also, check out the Second Annual year-long Big East thread for constant discussion of all relevant Big East topics. Go Big East!
Posted on: October 20, 2008 6:38 pm

Big East Preview 2, Connecticut Huskies

This one was a little easier, because I'd already done a lot of the research knowing that Connecticut was one of the preseason Big East favorites.  This is the team that many think will be the best of that leviathan of a conference, and for good reason.  Do I agree?  Read and find out.

24-9 Overall, 13-5 Big East (5th)
Eliminated second round of Big East tournament (by 5 seed West Virginia)
Lost opening round of NCAA tournament (as 4 seed)


Jeff Adrien                        F
Craig Austrie                   G
Kyle Bailey                       G
Donnell Beverly              G
Johnnie Bird                    G
Jerome Dyson                G
Gavin Edwards              F/C
Alex Hornat                       F
Curtis Kelly                       F
John Lindner                    F
Jonathan Mandeldove    C
AJ Price                             G
Stanley Robinson            F
Hasheem Thabeet          C
Jim Veronick                     F
Doug Wiggins                  G


Bird, Hornat, Kelly, Wiggins

Only Wiggins is a loss to speak of, and his 18.9 minutes, 6.7 points, and 2.7 rebounds will be easily replaced by the newcomers.  Two of the others didn't even play in 2007-2008.  It makes me wonder why the Huskies had such an enormous roster to begin with.  Why have so many players you aren't going to use?


Scottie Haralson      G
Charles Okwandu   C
Kemba Walker         G
Ater Majok                  F

There it is.  The freshman class the nation (of college bball fans, anyway) is going nuts about.  Even without Nate Miles, who I won't discuss in detail, it sounds like an imposing lineup on its own.  Add it to the list above, and you can see why this team is easy to like.  They will be especially deep and talented in the backcourt, which is something to think about when Thabeet grabs so many headlines up front.

The schedule:

Nonconference games:  Western Carolina, Hartford, La Salle, Bryant, Delaware State, Buffalo, Stony Brook, Gonzaga, Fairfield, Michigan

Wow.  Except for Gonzaga the Huskies should blow through that schedule.  They don't need a tough OOC schedule to be taken seriously, but they'd better avoid a hiccup.  Not that one would really hurt them much, assuming they do well in BE play.

Two-time opponents
: Pittsburgh, Notre Dame, Seton Hall

Ouch.  They're the favorites going in, but they have to play two of the other three front runners twice, and Pittsburgh and South Bend are notoriously difficult places to play.  Seton Hall should be easier.

Remaining roadies:  West Virginia, Cincinnati, St. John's, DePaul, Louisville, Marquette

Again, ouch.  Four of those six are very dangerous places to play.  Bad enough to get Pitt and ND twice, but adding a road game with Louisville is downright insulting.

Home games:  Georgetown, Rutgers, Villanova, Providence, Syracuse, South Florida

They probably wish they could swap their home and road Big East slate.  Not that the teams above are all pushovers, but it's a little softer.
The Outlook

Best Case Scenario:
     Hasheem Thabeet silences all his critics, and fills the holes in his game, while newcomer Okwandu and returning backup Mandeldove spell him effectively.  Jeff Adrien and Stanley Robinson hold it down up front, and some of the new blood takes the pessure off.  Four guards average 10 points a game or better, with AJ Price leading the way.  This all on their way to sweeping the Big East crowns, and cutting down the nets in New York and Detroit.  They are bandied about in the conversation of ten best teams in NCAA history.

Worst Case Scenario
     Again, this does NOT include the possibility of a major injury.  Thabeet still struggles at times to be consistent.  The new guys aren't quite what the Huskies were hoping for, and the team can't get enough help up front.  The deep backcourt and Thabeet's shot blocking keeps them in most games, though.  They wind up with 6 or 7 Big East losses, thanks to an unforgiving schedule, can't get t done in New York, and again exit the NCAA tournament prematurely.

My Take:
     This team could well be as good as the prognosticators are saying.  I don't think they will win the Big East title, at least not the regular season, thanks largely to a brutal slate of road games.  They might be the best team in it, regardless.  I know they will be very solid, and have plenty of depth, at guard.  AJ Price, Jerome Dyson, and Craig Austrie would be enough, but with Haralson and Walker coming in that backcourt is insane...and that doesn't even count the possibility of one of last year's backups stepping up with some quality minutes.  I do question their depth up front, though.  Thabeet is talented, but I believe he is criticized for a reason.  He changes games, but I wonder what the Huskies' contingency is for when he's in foul trouble.  Okwandu is tall, but can he play with the other Big East Centers?  Mandledove was not an effective backup last year.  The same is true at Forward.  Jeff Adrien and Stanley Robinson are solid, but after that I wonder.  Majok sounds like the real deal, but is he, and will he be ready?  Even with those potential issues, this team can score from anywhere and will play excellent defense.  I believe my best case scenario above is much more likely than the worst.  I wouldn't hand any team the BE crown, though, because at least three teams have the talent to press them.
Category: NCAAB
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com